August 11, 2009July 28,2009
On another note, the global consensus on a warming trend has found a
serious researcher who shows that 100 years of COOLING may be next. His long
term forecasts are so good bookies won't take his bets, and farmers buy his
data. Look at these links, and think about the longer term implications for
grains...
www.weatheraction.com
August 10, 2009
After a predicted series of zig zags ( after we closed above 950 S and P
500 higher highs were inevitable as we discussed) the market has gone from
overbought to short corrective patterns, soon followed by more buying and
higher highs. This week will likely see the same; that is to say, at least
one more high is likely this week, after short term corrective patterns. So
the upwards zigzags discussed after 950 S and P 500 have not yet lead to
anything so far other than buy the dips. Time cycles suggest this week may
see a short term top, followed by a deeper, more important, but still not
conclusive corrective pattern, followed later by still higher highs.
August 3, 2009
6 45 AM
After the small pullback we discussed, the higher highs we looked for have
arrived. Again short term over bought, but any pullback will still be
followed by higher highs.
June 26,2009Posted July 13, 2009
May 27, 2009May 22,2009
3 45 AM
After some more noise around the end of the month, a declining phase
should occur after June1. We still have resistance around 929 S and P 500.
Inflection point. Look at the S and P 500 and notice the channel. BigApril 21, 2009
buyers have bought the dips recently, and sold at the top of the channel.We
are near the bottom of the channel. Today looks to start down, then the test
will come.Will they buy the dip or will the channel fail?
Oscillators say overbought and it will fail.Recent history says they will
try to force it higher and eat the bears who watch the oscillators and are
shorting. Therefore, don't short and get eaten if they force it up again.But
overbought means a buy entrance is risky here.Therefore, this is a good time
for short term traders to do nothing.
April 20, 2009April 16, 2009
4 50 AM
Although we suggested standing aside on Thursday last, having captured a
good profit on the long side earlier, we did get the direction right, which
was UP, and avoided shorting, which in spite of overbought extremes, would
have been fatal.
It's best to come a bit late to the party and leave a bit early. We have
6 consecutive weeks up, and stochastics, a measure of overbought/oversold,
shows extreme overbought. It should correct now, here, and fairly soon in
price and time.
March 31,2009
6 25 AM
Inflection point. We failed at 8000 DJIA, and we found support yesterday
at the fall lows of 7500. We were oversold long term, and overbought short
term.
We had suggested gradually scaling out of long positions bought during the
rally, bought admittedly not at the exact lows, yet unlike others, we didn't
suggest SHORTING the rally, as that was like pushing down on a balloon
underwater, an exercise against nature. So those who bought, all made money
and escaped the latest carnage once again. What to do now? We are still in
whipsaw world, as seasonality is bullish, yet the revisited numbers of 8000
and 7500 are indicating indecision on traders' parts. Big commercial players
are largely short at this point, indicating they are playing against small
speculators who believe the rally has legs, but the big players can be early
in taking positions as they must acquire size slowly to avoid tipping off
the public.Maybe its time to wait to see if 8000-8200 is exceeded, and stand
aside.At this point, ALL traders covered their hugely profitable S and P 500
shorts near the lows on the way down in the crash over several days,
comfortably and easily below 7188, and sold their longs bought on the way up
recently, into strength, near the recent rally top. No position recommended
now.
(Note that he isn't predicting an immediate wipeout, but an eventual low below the recent lows)
An instructive read from the greatest hedge fund guy out there, posted on Yahoo..."Out of those four historical examples, Dalio says that our current situation most closely resembles the Great Depression because of the global breadth of the problems. But he doesn't like to use the term "depression." He thinks it's too scary, evoking as it does images of hobos and Hoovervilles, and distracts people from focusing on the mechanics of what is going on. He prefers to use a term he coined: "D-process."
Most people, says Dalio, think that a depression is simply a really, really bad recession. But in reality, the two are distinct, naturally occurring events. A recession is a contraction in real GDP brought on by a central bank tightening monetary policy, usually to control inflation, and ends when the central bank eases. But a D-process occurs when an economy has an unsustainably high debt burden and monetary policy ceases to be effective, usually because interest rates are close to zero, and the central bank has no way to stimulate the economy. To compensate, the value of debt must be written down (risking deflation) or the central bank must print money (a trigger of inflation), or some combination of both.
In recent years the level of debt as a percentage of GDP in the U.S. has skyrocketed past previous highs last seen in the early 1930s. And the Federal Reserve's benchmark rate is now hovering just above zero. To Dalio, therefore, it's clear that a D-process is under way. "It seems very likely that stocks will get materially cheaper," he says. "We have to go through an important debt restructuring process, and a lot of assets are going to be for sale, huge numbers of assets. And there's going to be a shortage of buyers."
Even investors in most hedge funds won't be immune. According to research by Bridgewater, the hedge fund industry in aggregate is 75% correlated to the S&P 500, an issue on which Dalio has been sounding an alarm for a couple of years now. "Too many people have a systematic bias toward positive economic growth," he says. "I think that what we're going to probably have is an economy that's going to get worse, with most people positioned for it to be better." By the end of the D-process, he expects that the reverse may well be the case."